March 21st, 2005
Schiavo Case Reveals Skewed Priorities
Denied the chance to drag the woman in front of Congress,
via a subpoena, the House is meeting in emergency session to
draft legislation designed to get Terri Schiavo's feeding tube
back in, and put her case before a Federal court. The Senate
is expected to meet and draft a similar bill, and President Bush
is cutting short his trip to his Texas Ranch to return to DC
and sign whatever comes out of the compromise. And, in theory,
this will buy Mrs. Schiavo a few more weeks (months? years?)
of a life she's not even aware of, anymore.
I have to say how nice it is to see Congress being this excited
about doing anything. I mean, I expect this kind of rapid
action from the Republican House, given their tendency to fast-track
pro-business measures before the Democrats can cry foul. But
if you watch them go at it, you sort of get the idea they're
just going through the motions. ("What, me work?")
But President Bush? Interrupt his vacation?
Keep in mind that this was the same man who didn't care to
interrupt his Christmas vacation, much less make a statement,
in the wake of last December's horrific Tsunami. I guess the
life of one American woman in a persistent vegetative state is
more important than the lives of hundreds of thousands of Asian
people, and the greatest natural and humanitarian disaster of
our lifetime?
(Oh, but we donated a lot of money, later. So that made it
okay for Bush not to make any "presumptive" statements
in the face of immense tragedy. That wouldn't have been... prudent?)
Also keep in mind that this is the same Senate that can't
be bothered to properly
investigate our faulty, pre-war Intelligence. I guess the
life of one American woman in a persistent vegetative state is
more important than the lives of American soldiers, who went
to save us from WMDs that just weren't there?
(Oh, but they have Democracy now, just like Hezbollah in Lebanon.
So that makes it okay to not care too much. That wouldn't be...
patriotic?)
But this is not - repeat, not - a Federal matter. Barring
the Supreme Court looking into the matter, which they've elected
not to do, it is a matter for the Florida courts to decide.
And, for better or for worse, they already have, and ruled in
favor of her husband's wishes.
Conservatives like to drone on and on about how the Federal
government routinely oversteps its bounds. This is a perfect
example, only this time it's the Conservatives, themselves, who
are behind the overstepping.
But that's okay, because "This is about defending life,"
as Press Secretary Scott McClellan put it. Even though all this
action - and who knows how many millions of taxpayers' dollars
- are bring brought to bear to save the "life" of woman
who is, for all intents and purposes, simply not there, anymore.
Anywhere from 100% to most of her cerebral cortex has atrophied
and been replaced with spinal fluid, and she's been in a persistent
vegetative state for the last 15 years.
And that's as perfect a snapshot of the Federal pro-life movement
as any. They'll move heaven and earth to stop one brain-dead
woman from having her feeding tube removed - and tomorrow, the
abortion clinics? - but they won't do that much to improve the
quality of life here at home. I mean, we can take care
of that ourselves, can't we?
Or can we? One of the major criticisms of capitalism - or
its most extreme application, via Libertarianism, at least -
is that people don't always make with the charity just because
they're being taxed less. It would be nice if Bush I's "thousand
points of light" were really out there, doing big favors
for tiny people. But I just don't see them, anymore (except for
the ones who get arrested for kiddy-diddling).
So if the Federal government's going to go to all this trouble
for one woman, who isn't really there anymore, why don't we
see this kind of concerted action and Federal oversight applied
to people who are here, and need help?
As it is, the Federal Government already has a metric ton
of problems on its plate. For example, how's that AIDS cure coming
along? Why are we sending millions in foreign aid when people
are starving, homeless and stuck below the poverty line right
here at home? How's that job creation going, and how are our
borders? Hell, how's the dollar, or our trade deficit, or our
national debt...?
I could go on, but you've got the idea. But does our Government?
Because if pro-life people in the Congress - and our "pro-life"
President - really want to grandstand on something, I can think
of a number of loose nails for them to bring the Federal hammer
down on top of.
And maybe we should start suggesting some.
/ Archives
/
|